Peer Reviews: Are Web-Based Ratings More Accurate Than Paper-and-Pen Ratings?

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

6-2007

Department

School of Business

Abstract

This paper examines advantages and disadvantages of using computers and networks to implement student peer evaluation of written work. Because data entry is accomplished electronically, web-based rating systems are less expensive and require less effort to administer than paper-based rating approaches for large groups. Thus, when adequate computers and internet access are available, web-based rating systems are an attractive alternative to traditional pencil-and-paper systems. Despite these advantages, questions remain. Will students engage in this process? Will students provide accurate ratings? What factors influence student performance in a peer review? In this paper, we compare the accuracy of ratings provided by students evaluating peers using a web-based system with those using a traditional pencil-and-paper system. We also examine the effect of contextual factors (anonymity, rater familiarity with computers, and length/complexity of rating item questions). The Business Review, Cambridge

Volume

7

Issue

1

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS